⚠️ Strategy’s mNAV Falls Below 1.0 — JPMorgan Warns Bitcoin Sales Policy Adds “Two-Way Risk”

📅 2 July 2026 | EarnFree.in | Crypto Deep Dive

A historic milestone hit Strategy this week — and not a good one. The company’s enterprise mNAV (market value versus BTC holdings) fell below 1.0 for the first time in years — meaning the market now values the entire company at LESS than the Bitcoin sitting on its balance sheet ($50.4B enterprise value vs ~$51.1B in BTC). JPMorgan says Strategy’s new bitcoin-sales policy adds “two-way risk” and should be scrapped for equity issuance instead.

📊 The mNAV Crisis — By the Numbers

Metric Value
Strategy enterprise value $50.4 billion
Strategy’s BTC holdings value ~$51.1 billion
mNAV ratio Below 1.0 (first time in years)
New capital framework Up to $2B buybacks + BTC-sale liquidity program
JPMorgan view Bitcoin sales policy = “two-way risk”
Recommended alternative Equity issuance instead of BTC sales
Consequence of mNAV < 1.0 Equity issuance to buy BTC becomes dilutive, not accretive
Strategy response Paused at-the-money share programs, shifting to preferred stock

🔍 Why This Matters for Every Bitcoin Treasury Company

For four years, Strategy’s model was simple: issue equity above BTC NAV → buy more Bitcoin → repeat. That flywheel required the stock to trade at a premium to its Bitcoin holdings. Now that premium has flipped to a discount — the exact scenario Strategy critics warned about. JPMorgan’s specific concern: a policy that allows selling BTC to fund liquidity needs creates uncertainty about whether Strategy is a “buy and hold forever” vehicle or a tactical trader — undermining the core investment thesis that attracted BTC-maximalist shareholders in the first place.

🎯 What This Means for Indian Investors

If you hold Strategy (MSTR) via US stock platforms (INDmoney, Vested), understand the risk has shifted — you’re now buying BTC exposure at a discount to NAV (theoretically attractive) but with governance uncertainty (theoretically risky). For pure BTC exposure without corporate structure risk, direct BTC ownership via Indian exchanges remains cleaner.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Highly volatile assets discussed.

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply